|
|
|
|
|
     
Decision Analysis: Strategies for Decision Making
 

It's easy to make good decisions when there are no bad options, a pundit once observed.
But he might have added that it helps if choices are clear, consequences are minor, and the decision rests with a single decision maker.

Fortunately, for the many day-to-day decisions that meet those criteria, the decision process is simple: Make an intuitive choice and proceed with little or no regret.

But what of high-stakes decisions that must be made in the face of competing priorities, multiple decision makers, and limited information? Common sense tells us that a high-quality decision making process will give us the best shot at a good outcome.


On This Page

> The "Trust Yur Gut" Myth
> Adopting a Transformational Strategy
> How it Works
> Time for Timely Decision Making
> Rigorous, Objective Analysis
> Elsewhere in This Section

Modeling allows decision makers to consider all their possibilities - and provides the timely information needed to take action.



The "Trust Your Gut" Myth

Given their significant consequences, strategic decisions are generally made with some care and deliberation. But after gathering all of the available information and completing an often lengthy decision process that may involve costly studies and multiple meetings, many decision makers nevertheless base their final choices on something less than scientific: gut feeling or their initial impressions.

In fact, according to researchers Dan Lovallo and Daniel Kahneman, executives have a tendency to make decisions based on "delusional optimism" rather than on a rational weighing of gains, losses and probabilities. (See "Delusions of Success: How Optimism Undermines Executives' Decisions," Harvard Business Review, July 2003.)

Other researchers confirm that instead of trying to come to terms with complexity, decision makers have a marked tendency to push it aside or ignore it. According to a recent study, 45% of corporate executives now rely more on instinct than on facts and figures in running their businesses. (See "Don't Trust Your Gut," Harvard Business Review, May 2003). Yet researchers agree that the more complex and difficult a decision, the less likely it is that intuition - when detached from rigorous analysis - will yield positive results.


Adopting a Transformational Strategy

Convinced that making good decisions is critical to their success - particularly in an unforgiving economy - decision makers across a wide variety of fields and organizations are changing their ways. With the help of new software and technology, they are adopting a more consistent, structured and rigorous decision-making strategy: decision analysis.

Introduced approximately 35 years ago, decision analysis has a proven ability to help users identify alternatives and options that maximize value. Corporate decision makers now use the process for all kinds of decisions involving resource allocation - from building a new plant, to acquiring a company, to evaluating new market opportunities.

Oil companies such as Conoco and Chevron use decision analysis to determine leasing strategies and make drilling decisions. Manufacturers use the methodology to help determine how much inventory to produce. Medical and pharmaceutical researchers use decision analysis to evaluate alternative drugs or treatments, or to help set new pharmaceutical prices. And lawyers use decision analysis to counsel clients on their litigation risks and help them negotiate optimal settlements.

The common thread? High-impact decisions involving significant investment, high complexity and elements of uncertainty.

How it Works

Decision analysis makes use of software tools to help users build models that represent specific decision problems, and then relies on statistical analysis to either determine the best course of action, or to discover what information is required to make a good decision.

One of the method's virtues is that it allows decision makers to quantify the uncertainties involved in a decision by expressing them in terms of probabilities. This distinction helps ensure the inclusion of some factors that decision makers might otherwise be tempted to dismiss.

Modeling options include influence diagrams View Figure 1 >>> which show all of the relationships relevant to making a decision, and decision trees, larger branching structures whose paths represent all of the reasonable alternatives and their outcomes View Figure 2 >>>. These models provide complementary approaches to looking at a particular decision problem.

Decision makers find that mapping alternatives on a decision tree model helps visualize all of the factors affecting a decision and each of the possible outcomes. Although it might theoretically be possible to test each and every alternative scenario in the real world, few would have the time or resources. By enabling virtual testing, modeling allows decision makers to consider all their possibilities - and provides the timely information needed to take action.

Time for Timely Decision Making

Some medical researchers are now using decision modeling to test different interventions and their effects, studying which treatments will save more lives or prove to be most cost-effective. Victor Grann, Clinical Professor of Medicine and Public Health at Columbia University's School of Public Health, uses decision tree analysis to compare the benefits of preventive treatment alternatives available to individuals who test positive for cancer gene mutations. Obtaining that kind of information from clinical trials, although important, will take many years, he said. But with the help of decision analysis, Grann is providing patients and their doctors with the information they need to make informed decisions now.

In some situations, delaying a decision can be more costly than embarking on a less than perfect path. For example, while researchers and policy makers debate the pro's and con's of alternative screening methods for cervical cancer, 200,000 South African women die from the disease each year for want of access to cancer screening.
Decision analysis can provide a basis for expedient action, enabling policy makers to make the best decision given the circumstances.

Professor Sue Goldie, who has been working to model various screening strategies for women in third world countries, believes that in cases like these, decision analysis can provide a basis for expedient action, enabling policy makers to make the best decision given the circumstances. (See "Good as Goldie," Harvard Public Health Review," Summer 2002.)

Decision makers know that complexity can often lead them to focus on the wrong problems.
But because decision analysis incorporates a process called sensitivity analysis, it can help determine which factors are really critical to a decision's outcome. That knowledge keeps decision makers from focusing on distinctions that make little difference, helping them avoid "analysis paralysis" and move on to a final decision.

"You only want to spend time discussing something relevant," said Gary Bush, Managing Director of Decision Strategies Inc., an international leader in the training and coaching of decision practices. By incorporating sensitivity analysis, decision analysis provides actionable parameters that help clients who are facing litigation reach a timely settlement.
When client Chevron Texaco was negotiating the terms of a joint project with an oil company partner, Decision Strategies used sensitivity analysis to help the company identify the variables that could make a real difference in the economics of the project … The difference between the project as originally proposed and the terms that Chevron finally negotiated amounted to a few hundred million dollars in value to Chevron.

"If one lawyer says we have a 50% chance of winning, and another lawyer says there's a 75% chance, with sensitivity analysis, we can turn around and say, 'If it's less than 80%, we settle,'" he said.

When client Chevron Texaco was negotiating the terms of a joint project with an oil company partner, Decision Strategies used sensitivity analysis to help the company identify the variables that could make a real difference in the economics of the project.That information was then used to establish Chevron Texaco's negotiating position. The difference between the project as originally proposed and the terms that Chevron finally negotiated amounted to a few hundred million dollars in value to Chevron, Bush said.

Rigorous, Objective Analysis

With TreeAge Software's TreeAge Pro package, decision makers can also consider the cost-effectiveness of possible alternatives. "I don't think there is another tool that has those functions, " Bush said.

The feature's users include leading pharmaceutical companies. By establishing the cost effectiveness of new products vis a vis other therapies, management can decide whether to invest in further development. The same cost effectiveness tools can also help managed care organizations or government policy makers (in Europe and Asia) decide if they will provide reimbursement for particular therapies.

Decision analysis doesn't guarantee a good decision. Like other software-based tools, it is subject to the perils of "garbage in, garbage out." But when it is well executed, incorporating probabilities based on accepted data and expert opinion, decision analysis generates highly credible results. It is easy to trace the thought process behind an analysis back through its decision tree. And familiar graphical tools, including probability wheels and bar charts, help communicate results in a way decision makers understand.

Thanks to the tool's credibility, decision analysis is beginning to play an important role in mediation. In a recent class action suit filed against Microsoft, Microsoft and lead counsel for the plaintiffs retained Marc Victor - an expert in the use of decision analysis for litigation risk analysis, and founder and president of Litigation Risk Analysis, Inc. - to ensure that the mediation was firmly grounded upon a rigorous and objective analysis of the legal and evidentiary merits. The settlement agreement obligates Microsoft to provide the plaintiff class up to $1.1 billion in vouchers.

Effective leaders have always prided themselves on their ability to shape the future by making good choices. But today's strategic decisions are just too complex to evaluate intuitively. By adopting decision analysis, decision makers can implement a rigorous strategy that will improve decision making for years to come - and lay a solid foundation for future success.


Elsewhere in This Section

> Markov Models - State Transition Models
> Discrete Event Simulation Models
> Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
> Monte Carlo Simulation



Learn how TreeAge Pro users are using decision analysis. >